[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fakeroot status
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: fakeroot status |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2002 15:51:40 -0400 (EDT) |
> Right, but I think the same thing is true in the case of fakeroot. At
> least, I think so unless there is some clear reason why it should face
> io_identity.
If you'd been following the discussion you'd have noticed that this came up
in the context of #! exec's lookup of the script file name.
- Re: fakeroot status, (continued)
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15