Re: Welcome to new maintainer Sami Kerola

[Sami Kerola]

On 23 November 2013 18:34, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Sami Kerola <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
>
> Not a maintainer, but I approve :-)
>
>> diff --git a/README b/README
>> index c2740ea..808413b 100644
>> --- a/README
>> +++ b/README
>> @@ -41,6 +41,22 @@ Bug reports:
>>  - unusual options you gave to configure, if any (see config.status).
>>  - anything else that you think would be helpful.
>>
>> +Patching process:
>> +- All changes must be sent to mailing list.
>> +- Changes are reviewed by maintainers.
>> +- Maintainer does not review own changes.
>> +  * In case of single maintainer, or unresponsive co-maintainer, mailing
>> +    list subscribers does the review.
>
> s/does/may perform/
>
>> +- Review means either a patch approval, comments to author, or a reject.
>> +  * Approved patches are taken to upstream git.
>> +  * Commented patches will require work before they can be approved.
>> +    Comments can be untechnical, such as a change author must submit a
>> +    copyright assignment to FSF.
>> +  * Authors are encouraged to discontinue work with rejected changes, as
>> +    the reject is permanent.
>> +- Maintainers keep track of rejected changes so that developers can avoid
>> +  proposing the same in future.
> ...

Pushed with small change proposed by Jim.

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/