bug#75405: gzip --synchronous doesn't work with musl

[Paul Eggert]

On 2025-01-07 10:22, Lasse Collin wrote:

> However, one thing that isn't an issue in musl is fchmod which is
> currently documented in Gnulib's doc/posix-headers/fcntl.texi. fchmod
> and a few others were fixed in 2013 by using /proc/self/fd.[1]

Is that a full fix, though? /proc might not be mounted.


> Gnulib's docs could be updated to remove fchmod and add fsync and
> fdatasync. Even if proc-based emulation was added, I don't see how it
> could be great if it needs to do open+fsync+close where the open with
> O_RDONLY might fail. But I might be missing something (again).
>
> [1] 
> https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=9ca1f62b0c0d3e50480eb654ac941ff943ce0558
>
> > Would the following Gnulib patch work around the musl bug?
>
> It does, thanks!

OK, I installed it.

> Should it check for __linux__ too to be sure that the workaround won't
> accidentally apply on some other kernel or libc that has O_PATH?

Anything else with O_SEARCH == O_PATH is likely to have similar 
problems. If not, we can cross that bridge when we come to it.


> It could be useful to add a test for gzip --synchronous.

Feel free....