[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32375: Bug Gzip v1.9
From: |
Johannes Przybilla |
Subject: |
bug#32375: Bug Gzip v1.9 |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:43:47 +0200 |
I agree that the POSIX standard is quite restrictive in this respect.
However I believe that is for a good reason.
Performing non-atomic memory operations on static objects in a signal handler
can cause problems with reentrancy.
This can lead to undefined behaviour for example in the case of nested signal
handler calls that update the same static object.
> Am 08.08.2018 um 06:56 schrieb Paul Eggert <address@hidden>:
>
> On 08/07/2018 03:50 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
>> I find posix too restrictive in this respect.
>
> Yes, me too.
>
> The file name length limit has been in gzip since forever, and is a
> separate issue (e.g. it happens regardless of signals). So if it is to
> be fixed it should be a separate bug number.
>