[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:27:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 12/14/10 10:48, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> I am not sure this is enough to guarantee the peaceful coexistence of both
> packages, unless the build-time option is to rename by default.
That sounds too drastic. I am not a fan of gzip's scripts,
but I've learned from years of maintenance that a lot of
people use them and depend on their every idiosyncrasy.
I suspect it's better to approach any such replacement conservatively,
where the default is to do things as they were done before.
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2010/12/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2010/12/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2010/12/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2010/12/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2010/12/17