bug#57052: elogind-service specifies a variable that's ignored by defualt

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

>For the record, this was noticed and discussed more than a year ago, see
>Message-ID: <871rens9a2.fsf@nckx>.  It had fallen into the cracks

LOL.  I'm the one who asked Cairn to report this.  I didn't remember publicly 
reporting it, I only remembered noticing it and not fixing it, and didn't want 
it to get forgotten 'again'.  Sorry for the noise!

Strongly disagree that the current Guix behaviour makes any sense, let alone 
better!  That sounds like posthockholm rationalisation to me.  If people want 
opinionated variants, those can be written on top of a service that properly 
exposes upstream behaviour.


Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent on the go.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.