bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#47717: guix outrageously exhaust itself (freeze) when there is packa


From: bo0od
Subject: bug#47717: guix outrageously exhaust itself (freeze) when there is package build failure
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:08:08 +0000

> Many people are happily using it, and are quite enthusiastic about it,
> so evidently it's "usable".  That doesn't imply that it's good for
> everyone.  Perhaps you would prefer a more traditional distro, or one
> that has had more time to mature.  If so, that's okay.

I can say that on almost any dying distro like slackware or so. But we need to overcome the issues which are leading to dead projects/distros.

The above issue is one of them if left without solution.

Mark H Weaver:
bo0od <bo0od@riseup.net> writes:

  > I mean the ‘outrageously’ part.  When Linux runs out of memory, it
  > freezes up.  Moral judgment is futile.  Better to adopt raingloom's
  > earlyoom suggestion or similar.

Im using default guix system nothing special, If this package usable to
solve these stuff i suggest then to include it by default.

'earlyoom' behavior is not necessarily desirable.  I, for one, have a
fairly old computer by today's standards, and sometimes I ask it to do
intensive things that are at the edge of its capabilities, such as
compiling GNU IceCat.  An aggressive 'earlyoom' might prematurely abort
jobs that could have completed, and thereby make it impossible for me to
continue using this old computer for development.

With that in mind, it's far from clear that 'earlyoom' should be our
default behavior.  It's good to have it as an option, though.

  > 4 GiB is absolutely not enough to build an outrageous amount of ‘modern’
  > software, especially in parallel (so not using --cores=1 --max-jobs=1)
  > to make use of those expensive cores.
  >
  > I'm disgusted too.

Yes it is, But you know this cant be a way of life with guix for end
user no? Something by default should solve this matter otherwise this is
not usable distro.

Many people are happily using it, and are quite enthusiastic about it,
so evidently it's "usable".  That doesn't imply that it's good for
everyone.  Perhaps you would prefer a more traditional distro, or one
that has had more time to mature.  If so, that's okay.

       Regards,
         Mark






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]