[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:19:08 +0200 |
Hi Guillaume,
Thank you for asking upstream.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 18:45, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> wrote:
> A developer of SBCL agrees that the timestamp should be removed [1], but
> currently Slime has a function depending on it. I asked if this could
> be fixed [2]. We'll see...
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sbcl/mailman/message/37133640/
Ouch! Hard to read when not subscribed. :-)
> [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583
If upstream does not want to patch, do you think it is doable to patch
SLIME and maintain the patch with the Guix package?
Thanks,
simon
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, zimoun, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Guillaume Le Vaillant, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible,
zimoun <=
- bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/22
bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/21