bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#26594: guix pull --bootstrap does not work


From: Msavoritias
Subject: bug#26594: guix pull --bootstrap does not work
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:48:20 +0200

Forgot to attach the log. 

My error is this:

[ 1/84] Loading './gcrypt/hash.scm'...
[ 2/84] Loading './git.scm'...
[ 3/84] Loading './gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm'...
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
3001: 19 [#<procedure 14e4870 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2982:17 ()>]
In unknown file:
   ?: 18 [primitive-load-path "guix/packages" ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 505: 17 [#<procedure b91b20 at ice-9/eval.scm:499:4 (exp)> (define-module # # ...)]
In ice-9/psyntax.scm:
1091: 16 [expand-top-sequence ((define-module # # # ...)) () ((top)) ...]
 976: 15 [scan ((define-module (guix packages) #:use-module ...)) () ...]
 270: 14 [scan ((#(syntax-object let # ...) (#) (# #) ...)) () ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 411: 13 [eval # ()]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2870: 12 [define-module* (guix packages) #:filename ...]
2845: 11 [resolve-imports (((guix utils)) ((guix records)) ((guix store)) ...)]
2783: 10 [resolve-interface (guix utils) #:select ...]
2708: 9 [#<procedure c34020 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2696:4 (name #:optional autoload version #:key ensure)> # ...]
2981: 8 [try-module-autoload (guix utils) #f]
2320: 7 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 153a180 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2982:17 ()>]
3001: 6 [#<procedure 153a180 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:2982:17 ()>]
In unknown file:
   ?: 5 [primitive-load-path "guix/utils" ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 453: 4 [eval # ()]
 411: 3 [eval # ()]
 411: 2 [eval # ()]
 411: 1 [eval # ()]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [dynamic-func "strverscmp" #<dynamic-object #f>]

ERROR: In procedure dynamic-func:
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-pointer: Symbol not found: strverscmp

Marinus

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 20:45, Msavoritias <marinus.savoritias@disroot.org> wrote:
Hi, 

I did today guix pull --bootstrap and it still seems not to work. I asked in IRC and it seems that the option is pretty much useless anyway today.
Can anyone confirm if that is true? Maybe consider removing the option if that happens.

Marinus

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]