[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#41908: guix time-machine fails; XXXX is not related to introductory
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#41908: guix time-machine fails; XXXX is not related to introductory commit of channel 'guix' |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:53:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> Just to be sure to understand:
>
> 1- * 41a2d6a8b9 (newer)
> 2- * e70e097882 (between)
> 3- * 36640207c9 (older)
> 4- * xxxxxxxxxx (first authenticated commit)
>
> From a fresh cache,
>
> a) if #2 is authenticated, because it is descendant of #4, it is stored
> and all the commits between (closure), i.e., #3 should be considered as
> authenticated.
>
> b) then if #1 is authenticated, because it is a descendant of the last
> authenticated i.e. #2, it is stored in the cache.
>
> c) now let try #3. It is considered authenticated because in the closure
> of #4 and #2.
>
> Yes it makes sense. All is good. :-)
Yup, looks correct. :-)
> (And the assumption is: if Guix does not raise then it means that the
> commit is authenticated.)
Exactly. I know it’s disappointing, but it’s one of these features
that’s pretty much invisible until you run into troubles.
Ludo’.
- bug#41908: guix time-machine fails; XXXX is not related to introductory commit of channel 'guix', (continued)
bug#41908: guix time-machine fails; XXXX is not related to introductory commit of channel 'guix', Marius Bakke, 2020/06/20
bug#41908: guix time-machine fails; XXXX is not related to introductory commit of channel 'guix', Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/21