[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull'
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull' |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:27:08 +0100 |
Hi Ludo,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 15:36, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> All that said, I think it’s fine to recommend “guix pull -p” in the
> manual, but I just wanted to make sure people know about “make
> as-derivation”, which can be slightly more convenient in cases where you
> don’t want to commit the change to test it.
Both can be mentioned in the manual because they target different usage, IMHO.
All the best,
simon
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', (continued)
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/12
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', zimoun, 2019/12/12
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/13
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', zimoun, 2019/12/13
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', zimoun, 2019/12/13
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/13
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/14
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/16
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/16
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull', Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/12/16
- bug#38528: Add test for `guix pull',
zimoun <=