[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37318: OpenNTPD generated config is convoluted
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
bug#37318: OpenNTPD generated config is convoluted |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 13:47:06 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
I also can't seem to make it sync, see my test below.
Tests:
# Set the date to somewhere in the past
sudo date -s 'Tue Sep 3 12:00:00 JST 2019'
# Set the hwclock to the same wrong date
sudo hwclock --systohc
Then I launched (open)ntpd manually in verbose mode:
sudo /gnu/store/j4abi03pc4b0gfs2mlbzyd6g9bjqphyc-openntpd-6.2p3/sbin/ntpd -f
/gnu/store/v2cqcxliivrcn1rlz78p6mg21k7pxyrx-ntpd.conf -d -s -v
adjtimex returns frequency of 27.512100ppm
listening on 127.0.0.1
listening on ::1
ntp engine ready
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2001:470:142:3::a received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 209.51.188.148 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no reply received in time, skipping initial time setting
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
constraint: failed to load constraint ca
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next query
900s
no constraint reply from 172.217.31.132 received in time, next query 900s
no constraint reply from 2404:6800:4004:818::2004 received in time, next
query 900s
cat /gnu/store/v2cqcxliivrcn1rlz78p6mg21k7pxyrx-ntpd.conf
listen on 127.0.0.1
listen on ::1
constraints from "https://www.google.com/"
constraints from "https://www.google.com/"
sensor udcf0 correction 70000
constraints from "https://www.google.com/"
server 0.guix.pool.ntp.org
server 1.guix.pool.ntp.org
server 2.guix.pool.ntp.org
server 3.guix.pool.ntp.org
constraints from "https://www.google.com/"
constraints from "https://www.google.com/"
constraint from www.gnu.org
Many tens of minutes later my date is still stuck in the past (despite
using the "-s" flag, which is supposed to set the time immediately
rather than slowly at startup).
Am I missing something?
Maxim