bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#34066: patch-and-repack can truncate version number


From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: bug#34066: patch-and-repack can truncate version number
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:43:56 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:

> When using 'git-fetch' for the source, when a patch is applied part of
> the version number is truncated.
>
> The following derivations will be built:
>    /gnu/store/zsy0j8jfg4q4nz8xk5bpc3h5qrclm679-opencv-3.4.3-checkout.drv
>    /gnu/store/kadg4jnyar79mpz5bmmg4w3qgn0iy81r-opencv-3.4.tar.xz.drv

I guess the issue is in 'tarxz-name', defined within 'patch-and-repack':

  (define (tarxz-name file-name)
    ;; Return a '.tar.xz' file name based on FILE-NAME.
    (let ((base (if (numeric-extension? file-name)
                    original-file-name
                    (file-sans-extension file-name))))
      (string-append base
                     (if (equal? (file-extension base) "tar")
                         ".xz"
                         ".tar.xz"))))

Unless the extension (everything after the last '.') of the original
file name is composed entirely of hexadecimal characters, it is removed.
In this case, I guess the extension is "3-checkout", so it's removed.

I'm reluctant to suggest a fix until I understand the rationale for this
behavior.  It was added by Ludovic in February 2014, in commit
3ca00bb51e3ff906a700b6925e0ce81558c8c469.

  commit 3ca00bb51e3ff906a700b6925e0ce81558c8c469
  Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
  Date:   Fri Feb 28 10:41:44 2014 +0100

  packages: Support 'patches' and 'snippets' for sources that are directories.
  
  * guix/packages.scm (patch-and-repack)[numeric-extension?, tarxz-name]:
    New procedures.
    [builder]: Adjust to deal with SOURCE when it's a directory.
    <body>: Use 'tarxz-name'.  Always add (guix build utils) to
    IMPORTED-MODULES.

Do you remember why you decided to remove non-numeric extensions,
Ludovic?

     Thanks,
       Mark





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]