bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"

[Mark H Weaver]

Hi Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> As discussed with Pierre at the R-B Summit, ‘sbcl-next’ lacks a
> reference to ‘next-gtk-webkit’ even though is invokes it:
>
> $ guix gc --references $(type -P next) | grep next-
> /gnu/store/9d66xb8wvggsp0x9pxj61mzqy007978f-sbcl-next-1.1.0
> /gnu/store/pqy064fw3vkfld6lw95vi0zavj19zvrc-sbcl-next-1.1.0-lib
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix run next
>
> WARNING: Setting locale failed.
>   Check the following variables for correct values:
>   LANG=en_US.utf8
> Unhandled SIMPLE-ERROR in thread #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "main thread" RUNNING
>                                     {10005885B3}>:
>   Couldn't execute 
> "/gnu/store/7p6pbcmdgr53dff6033gcfl2jq0d762h-next-gtk-webkit-1.1.0/bin/next-gtk-webkit":
>  No such file or directory
>
>
> (Here ‘guix run’ runs ‘next’ in a container with exactly the closure of
> ‘next’, nothing more, and the ‘next’ binary is grafted.)
>
> So the problem looks a lot like that this GCC issue we fixed a while
> back: <https://bugs.gnu.org/24703>.
>
> Looking at the ‘sbcl-next’ package, the reference to ‘next-gtk-webkit’
> is inserted in gtk-webkit.lisp:
>
> (defvar *gtk-webkit-command* "next-gtk-webkit"
>   "Path to the GTK-Webkit platform port executable.")
>
>
> Through hexl-mode on the ‘next’ binary, we can find that reference:
>
> 01d0bac0: 2f00 0000 6700 0000 6e00 0000 7500 0000  /...g...n...u...
> 01d0bad0: 2f00 0000 7300 0000 7400 0000 6f00 0000  /...s...t...o...
> 01d0bae0: 7200 0000 6500 0000 2f00 0000 3700 0000  r...e.../...7...
> 01d0baf0: 7000 0000 3600 0000 7000 0000 6200 0000  p...6...p...b...
> 01d0bb00: 6300 0000 6d00 0000 6400 0000 6700 0000  c...m...d...g...
> 01d0bb10: 7200 0000 3500 0000 3300 0000 6400 0000  r...5...3...d...
> 01d0bb20: 6600 0000 6600 0000 3600 0000 3000 0000  f...f...6...0...
> 01d0bb30: 3300 0000 3300 0000 6700 0000 6300 0000  3...3...g...c...
> 01d0bb40: 6600 0000 6c00 0000 3200 0000 6a00 0000  f...l...2...j...
> 01d0bb50: 7100 0000 3000 0000 6400 0000 3700 0000  q...0...d...7...
> 01d0bb60: 3600 0000 3200 0000 6800 0000 2d00 0000  6...2...h...-...
> 01d0bb70: 6e00 0000 6500 0000 7800 0000 7400 0000  n...e...x...t...
> 01d0bb80: 2d00 0000 6700 0000 7400 0000 6b00 0000  -...g...t...k...
> 01d0bb90: 2d00 0000 7700 0000 6500 0000 6200 0000  -...w...e...b...
> 01d0bba0: 6b00 0000 6900 0000 7400 0000 2d00 0000  k...i...t...-...
> 01d0bbb0: 3100 0000 2e00 0000 3100 0000 2e00 0000  1.......1.......
> 01d0bbc0: 3000 0000 2f00 0000 6200 0000 6900 0000  0.../...b...i...
> 01d0bbd0: 6e00 0000 2f00 0000 6e00 0000 6500 0000  n.../...n...e...
> 01d0bbe0: 7800 0000 7400 0000 2d00 0000 6700 0000  x...t...-...g...
> 01d0bbf0: 7400 0000 6b00 0000 2d00 0000 7700 0000  t...k...-...w...
> 01d0bc00: 6500 0000 6200 0000 6b00 0000 6900 0000  e...b...k...i...
> 01d0bc10: 7400 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  t...............
> 01d0bc20: e100 0100 0000 0000 2800 0000 0000 0000  ........(.......
> 01d0bc30: 2a47 544b 2d57 4542 4b49 542d 434f 4d4d  *GTK-WEBKIT-COMM
> 01d0bc40: 414e 442a 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  AND*............
>
> Apparently this string literal is stored as UTF-32 (UCS-4) or similar,
> which prevents the reference scanner and the grafting code from finding
> it, and problems ensue.  :-)

IMO, we should consider modifying Guix to search for store references
encoded in UTF-32 and/or UTF-16.  I wouldn't be surprised if some other
programs use those encodings.  I'd be willing to work on it.

What do you think?

      Mark