bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#32845: guix.info: Missing manual


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#32845: guix.info: Missing manual
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:03:25 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Hello!

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>> I wonder what should be done with guix.info: should we keep it as a
>> mirror, or should it redirect to gnu.org, or the opposite?
>
> I really don’t know.  I didn’t plan for guix.info to become popular, but
> it certainly is convenient right now as we can change DNS records at a
> whim.
>
> Currently, the manual shown on guix.info is fairly close to the latest
> in git.  This means it contains documentation about channels, which
> cannot be found in the latest release that matches the manual on
> gnu.org.

Yes, it’s convenient.

>> My initial plan was to use guix.gnu.org as the primary domain but we’re
>> stuck with the “Let’s Encrypt vs. multiple entries in DNS A records”
>> issue.  At the same time, guix.info works just fine.
>
> I thought the bigger issue was running a DNS server, which is something
> I’ve never done and wouldn’t like to take on myself.

I’ve never done it either :-) but our Knot service makes it looks easy.

> The problem with naive Let’s Encrypt updates is that automatic
> challenges might fail when the “wrong” server is returned by the DNS
> server.  “certbot” can be used with manual DNS validation, which
> requires us to deploy a DNS TXT record.  This can be automated with
> certbot hooks (scripts that have access to the token that should be
> published via environment variables) or through JSON mode, which returns
> an object with the token that can be processed through other means.

I didn’t know about all this!  Looks like our Certbot service doesn’t
support it though?

> I think the Let’s Encrypt updates shouldn’t be a blocker.

To me it was the main blocker.

Let’s see if we can bring more knowledgeable people on board…

Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]