On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> >
> > > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> > > pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
> > > users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0.
> > >
> > > It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's
> > > packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never updated
> > > root's packages at all, for ~1 year.
>
> They could have been stuck with an old daemon if they copied the systemd
> or upstart service files we provide.
>
> That problem should be fixed by 613d0895b92c677e0639d5e77c55043e38e020c8
> (build: Don't embed absolute paths in .service and .conf service
> files.).
That is right. But
1) there was no release with this "fix"
2) I (as distro package maintainer) didn't take this patch manually as
it is fragile and hacky. Have you considered fresh guix installation?
This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a
problem that arises when somebody installs the binary release of Guix.
I'm not addressing downstream packages of Guix with this commit.