bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#24416: address@hidden is broken


From: Danny Milosavljevic
Subject: bug#24416: address@hidden is broken
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 11:18:22 +0200

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:29:11 -0400
"Thompson, David" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Danny Milosavljevic
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > As a workaround,
> >
> > CPPFLAGS += -I${HOME}/.guix-profile/avr/include
> > LDFLAGS += -L${HOME}/.guix-profile/avr/lib/avr5 
> > -L${HOME}/.guix-profile/avr/lib -B${HOME}/.guix-profile/avr/lib
> >
> > works with avr-gcc 5.3.0. Unfortunately I don't know enough about avr-gcc 
> > to be able to permanently fix it.
> >
> > I fixed part of it (I made it so that atmega32u4 exists in the first place) 
> > in master - but no idea what to do with the search path.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that if it uses CROSS_CPATH it's incorrect because 
> > cross-base has been changed from CROSS_CPATH to CROSS_C_INCLUDE_PATH, 
> > CROSS_CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH etc in order to suppress warnings. If 
> > CROSS_C_INCLUDE_PATH overrides CROSS_CPATH (does it?) then setting 
> > CROSS_CPATH like avr.scm does does no good.
> >
> > I propose to change it to the following:
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/avr.scm b/gnu/packages/avr.scm
> > index 9873477..1e5fd73 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/avr.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/avr.scm
> > @@ -59,9 +59,18 @@
> >                   #t))))
> >           ((#:configure-flags flags)
> >            `(delete "--disable-multilib" ,flags))))
> > -      (native-search-paths
> > +      (native-search-paths
> >         (list (search-path-specification
> > -              (variable "CROSS_CPATH")
> > +              (variable "CROSS_C_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > +              (files '("avr/include")))
> > +             (search-path-specification
> > +              (variable "CROSS_CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > +              (files '("avr/include")))
> > +             (search-path-specification
> > +              (variable "CROSS_OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH")
> > +              (files '("avr/include")))
> > +             (search-path-specification
> > +              (variable "CROSS_OBJCPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH")
> >                (files '("avr/include")))
> >               (search-path-specification
> >                (variable "CROSS_LIBRARY_PATH")  
> 
> I don't know if this will have the intended effect and I cannot
> experiment with it right now.  Could you test?  

(The patch: ) Can't test it right now (out of disk space; updating 2 GB texmf 
is really annoying) - but I tested it in the past and it wasn't sufficient. On 
the other hand, before the patch is applied, cross-gcc and avr.scm set 
*different* variables and that's probably incorrect.

> The LDFLAGS above
> include the path to the device-specific object files (/avr5), but
> avr-gcc is supposed to be able to figure that out on its own using a
> "normal" library path, so I'm skeptical that simply changing the
> search paths for the package is enough.

I've used these LDFLAGS (actually used them as global flags for all gcc 
invocations) for some weeks with daily success. Also, the "-B" is necessary.

I think that the "native-search-paths" only affect the build system.

As far as I understand, avr-gcc is a "native" compiler in the sense of 
it-shouldn't-try-to-build-all-Guix-packages-for-it. And it's certainly set up 
as a "native" compiler. But that means that the avr-gcc port has to hack the 
search path that gcc usually uses for native compilers to make it search 
something else - not sure where they do and why it doesn't work for us. It 
would be good to locate this part.

The atmega32u4 comes from avr-libc (!) - that's why I changed avr-libc to use 
the same compiler (already in master for some months). That made it work much 
better.

I hope someone can shed a light on this.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]