[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:19:59 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Lirzin (2015-12-31 01:45 +0300) wrote:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I had to think a lot because that’s a big change (technically simple I
>> think, but it’s the change of UI and habits that’s bigger ;-)). I came
>> to the conclusion that it’s probably a necessary thing.
>
> Sure, such change should not be made lightly.
>
>> Regarding the aesthetics, I’d be in favor of using @ for the version:
>
> You mean like npm... :)
>
>> address@hidden
>> address@hidden:doc
>>
>> I’m not sure if we should also allow:
>>
>> guile:address@hidden
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'm OK with that. Since choosing the reserved characters is not a
> technical decision, maybe we could poll users?
I'm for the polling (but how should it be organized?) I don't really
like "@" character.
--
Alex
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/08
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/10
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/21
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/22
- bug#19219: Package names with digits following dashes, Alex Kost, 2015/12/23
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/30
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Efraim Flashner, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?,
Alex Kost <=
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/31
- bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2015/12/31