bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl


From: Andreas Enge
Subject: Re: #!/usr/bin/env perl
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:43:12 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Am Montag, 25. Februar 2013 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:
> > (has-env (string-suffix? "/env" interp))
> 
> I think we might want to make this test more restrictive.  I'm looking
> at a package (guile-figl) that includes an 'env' script in its build
> directory, analogous to 'pre-inst-env' in Guix.  This makes me worry
> that the test above will have false positives.
> 
> In practice, the path used is (almost?) always "/usr/bin/env".
> I suspect it would be safer to check for that exact string.

I also wondered whether we should do this. Do you have a concrete example 
where the current test fails? Notice that the suffix is only part of the 
test; currently, we patch files that start with
   [[:blank:]]*#![[:graph:]]*/env
Unless a problem manifests itself, I would not change that behaviour.

Andreas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]