[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New “guix pull” command
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: New “guix pull” command |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:28:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Can you run
>> guix build /nix/store/7pp5x6b3ikz6vnvrdlr836bjp4sbgbg8-guix-latest.drv
>> and post the log?
>
> Unpacking og guix-0.2, then:
[...]
> ?: 3 [module-variable #<directory (guix build download) 3243e10> make-
> session]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2732: 2 [b #<autoload (gnutls) 350b870> make-session #f]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 1 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 106: 0 [#<procedure 2a4e280 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>
> misc-error ...]
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #<procedure 2a4e280 at
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: missing interface for module (gnutls)
I believe this is fixed by 7b50c68 (which is like 855a8ad).
Can you confirm?
(Note how the file system introduces non-determinism in a way that can
have a concrete effect: the bug above would show up only if
guix/build/download.scm wasn’t built when guix/scripts/download.scm was
compiled, which depends on the order in which files were traversed.)
Ludo’.