[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distro name
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Distro name |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:32:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
"Jason Self" <address@hidden> skribis:
> Hmm. It might make sense to differentiate when a third party is
> involved, but not when the GNU Project itself is doing it.
[...]
> I guess it depends on what you define an "an official complete GNU
> system release" to be. That would ultimately have to come from RMS,
> of course, but if the only difference is the kernel (but both kernels
> are official GNU packages) and the distro offered the option of using
> both of them, the line seems perhaps a little bit more blurry in that
> regard.
Hmm yes, that makes sense (and indeed, the longer-term goal is to
support several kernels.)
That would comfort me in choosing the (gnu ...) name space.
Ludo’.