[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
guile-2.0.1 on 64-bit PowerPC Gentoo Linux: one test failure
From: |
Nelson H. F. Beebe |
Subject: |
guile-2.0.1 on 64-bit PowerPC Gentoo Linux: one test failure |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:39:28 -0600 (MDT) |
I've just done two builds of guile-2.0.1 on 64-bit PowerPC Gentoo
Linux with differing choices of PATH. Here are the settings for one
of them:
% cat /etc/gentoo-release
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.14
% gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.2, pie-0.4.5) 4.4.5
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
LDFLAGS='-Wl,-rpath,/lib -L/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib -L/usr/lib
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib'
LIBS=-lgc
The builds are successful, but there is a single test failure:
PASS: test-asmobs
bad return from expression `(f-s8-)': expected -100; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u8-)': expected 200; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s16-)': expected -20000; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u16-)': expected 40000; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s32-)': expected -2000000000; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u32-)': expected 4000000000; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s8-u8 10)': expected -90; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u8-u8 10)': expected 210; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s16-u8 10)': expected -19990; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u16-u8 10)': expected 40010; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s32-u8 10)': expected -1999999990; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u32-u8 10)': expected 4000000010; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s8-s64 10)': expected -90; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u8-s64 10)': expected 210; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s16-s64 10)': expected -19990; got -1
bad return from expression `(f-u16-s64 10)': expected 40010; got 0
bad return from expression `(f-s32-s64 10)': expected -1999999990; got
-1
bad return from expression `(f-u32-s64 10)': expected 4000000010; got 0
Backtrace:
In module/ice-9/boot-9.scm:
170: 9 [catch #t #<catch-closure 3ab03240> ...]
In unknown file:
?: 8 [catch-closure]
In module/ice-9/boot-9.scm:
62: 7 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In module/ice-9/eval.scm:
389: 6 [eval # #]
In module/ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1918: 5 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 3aaba380 at
module/ice-9/boot-9.scm:3341:3 ()>]
3346: 4 [#<procedure 3aaba380 at module/ice-9/boot-9.scm:3341:3 ()>]
1190: 3 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1195: 2 [#<procedure 3ab2cb70 ()>]
In unknown file:
?: 1 [primitive-load
"/local/build/bare/guile-2.0.1/test-suite/standalone/test-ffi"]
?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
ERROR: incorrect result (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
FAIL: test-ffi
...
==================================
1 of 23 tests failed
(1 test was not run)
Please report to address@hidden
==================================
I have a recent installation of -lffi:
% ls -log /usr/local/lib/libffi*
-rw-r--r-- 1 202394 Feb 18 15:52 /usr/local/lib/libffi.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 925 Feb 18 15:52 /usr/local/lib/libffi.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 15 Feb 18 15:52 /usr/local/lib/libffi.so ->
libffi.so.6.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 15 Feb 18 15:52 /usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6 ->
libffi.so.6.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 147113 Feb 18 15:52 /usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6.0.0
/usr/local/lib/libffi-3.0.10rc5:
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 2 4096 Feb 18 15:52 include
Any ideas for debugging the test failure?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nelson H. F. Beebe Tel: +1 801 581 5254 -
- University of Utah FAX: +1 801 581 4148 -
- Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB Internet e-mail: address@hidden -
- 155 S 1400 E RM 233 address@hidden address@hidden -
- Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090, USA URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- guile-2.0.1 on 64-bit PowerPC Gentoo Linux: one test failure,
Nelson H. F. Beebe <=