bug-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] [Help-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16


From: Patrick Alken
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] [Help-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:24:39 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6

Thats strange, on my system utils/memcpy.c doesn't get compiled, and its not in Makefile.am. Are you manually trying to compile it or is automatically part of the build process on your system?

On 05/30/2013 01:12 PM, Heiko Bauke wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:11:16 -0600
Patrick Alken <address@hidden> wrote:

I have uploaded a test release for gsl 1.16 here:

http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz
http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz.sig

All reports are welcome - anyone who can test on various platforms
would be appreciated (BSD, Mac OS, Windows).

Please try testing the build and also the documentation (I upgraded
the texinfo.tex file in doc/ so I want to make sure that works with
everyone's configuration)

1) ./configure ; make ; make check
2) cd doc ; make ps

Report any successes/failures to address@hidden


compiling on Ubuntu 12.04 using gcc 4.8 with

CC=gcc-4.8 CFLAGS="-Wpedantic -Wextra -Wall" ./configure

I get a lot of warnings.  Most of them might be harmless.  Others may
hint to actual errors. For example (plus -Werror)

memcpy.c: In function ‘memcpy’:
memcpy.c:13:19: error: argument ‘len’ doesn’t match built-in prototype
[-Werror] unsigned int len;
                    ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Do you think it is (still) a good idea to provide an own memcpy
function coded in K&R C?

»make check« does not detect any errors.


        Heiko






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]