[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: [Bug-gsl] value of gsl_sf_bessel_i0_scaled at 0

**From**: |
address@hidden |

**Subject**: |
Re: [Bug-gsl] value of gsl_sf_bessel_i0_scaled at 0 |

**Date**: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:59:42 -0700 |

After some experiments, I don't think it's a bug. In the documentation (
http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Regular-Modified-Spherical-Bessel-Functions.html),
gsl_sf_bessel_i0_scaled
and gsl_sf_bessel_i0_scaled_e are defined as follows:
These routines compute the scaled regular modified spherical Bessel
function of zeroth order, \exp(-|x|) i_0(x).
where
i_l(x) = \sqrt{\pi/(2x)} I_{l+1/2}(x)
If you use the formula for i_0(x) from the documentation, Wolfram Alpha,
which is based on Mathematica, gives different values (-1 and 1) for one
sided limits:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+exp%28-%7Cx%7C%29+sqrt%28pi%2F%282x%29%29+BesselI%5B1%2F2%2C+x%5D+as+x+-%3E+0%2B
However, assuming \sqrt(x) = i \sqrt(-x) for negative x, gives
i_0(x) = \exp(-|x|) sinh(x) / x
and i_0(0) = 1 which is consistent with the GSL implementation.
Best regards,
Victor
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, address@hidden <
address@hidden> wrote:
>* Hi All,*
>
>* Is there any particular reason that gsl_sf_bessel_i0_scaled(0) returns 1*
>* instead of NaN, or is it a bug? The function has different one-sided limits*
>* at 0 (-1 and 1).*
>
>* Thanks,*
>* Victor*
>