Re: [Bug-gsl] GSL 1.9 test_cblas vs Intel MKL

[Brian Gough]

At Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:42:18 +0200,
Albert Strasheim wrote:
> The chance of this being the case is probably slight, but are there
> any functions in GSL that depend on GSL's BLAS's behaviour for
> negative incX? I guess I could set a few breakpoints or add printfs
> to see if negative incXs get passed in when the unit tests are run.

GSL only uses positive strides internally (stride is a size_t is
gsl_vector) so that should not be a problem.

-- 
Brian Gough
(GSL Maintainer)

Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing the GSL Manual - http://www.network-theory.co.uk/gsl/manual/