Re: [Bug-gsl] Naming of wavelet functions

[Brian Gough]

Kevin Bube writes:
 > as already mentioned in a previous mail on this list, there is a
 > discrepancy between the naming of wavelet functions in the documentation
 > and the actual header file (gsl_dwt_* vs. gsl_wavelet_*). I would
 > advocate to change the header file to the gsl_dwt_* form because this
 > would make it easier to later include the continuous wavelet transform
 > (with gsl_cwt_*).

Thanks for the bug report.
I previously fixed the documentation to follow the code.
In hindsight, using gsl_dwt would have been a better choice for
the code (also matches gsl_fft) but I will have to stick with that for now.

 > Btw. is anybody working on the CWT? If I find the time I could possibly
 > do this as I already have a selfwritten implementation which needed to
 > be integrated in the GSL framework.

Noone is working on it to my knowledge.. see here for more information.
http://sources.redhat.com/gsl/design/gsl-design.html#SEC2

-- 
best regards 

Brian Gough

Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing Free Software Manuals --- http://www.network-theory.co.uk/