bug-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #13606] GRUB should allow Linux command-line>256 bytes with boot pr


From: Alon Bar-Lev
Subject: [bug #13606] GRUB should allow Linux command-line>256 bytes with boot protocol>2.02
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 10:40:22 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050527 Firefox/1.0+

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=13606>

                 Summary: GRUB should allow Linux command-line>256 bytes with
boot protocol>2.02
                 Project: GNU GRUB
            Submitted by: alonbl
            Submitted on: Sat 07/02/2005 at 10:40
                Category: Booting
                Severity: Major
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Action Request
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: Alon Bar-Lev
        Originator Email: address@hidden
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 0.96-2
         Reproducibility: Every Time
         Planned Release: 

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Please consider the following:
Currently (legacy and new) grub forces the 2.02 protocol cmd_line_ptr to point
to the same memory area of the old protocol.

The result is that the limitation of the old protocol to a 256 bytes
command-line is inherit by the new protocol.

Please consider changing this behavior so that new protocol can receive more
than 256 bytes.

if (lh->version >= 0x0202)
-  lh->cmd_line_ptr = linux_data_real_addr + LINUX_CL_OFFSET;
+  lh->cmd_line_ptr = fixup (arg);







    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=13606>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]