bug-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: forwarded message from Thierry Laronde


From: Graeme Vetterlein
Subject: RE: forwarded message from Thierry Laronde
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:49:55 +0100

Andries,

I am the user reporting the original problem ... the nettiquete on the
quoting
is starting to lose me ... several breaks. I hope the snippet below is a
correct quote
from you:

AB> (More precisely: The four primary partitions are always numbered,
AB> and always numbered in table order.  The logical partitions are
AB> numbered in chain order.  If the chain zigzags over the disk,
AB> then chain order will differ from sector order.
AB> Neither Linux nor DOS has any objection against zigzagging chains.)


The original problem is that W2K would not boot. Specifically it gave the
message: 

        windows 2000 could not start because the following file is missing
or corrupt: <windows 2000 root>/system32/ntoskrnl.exe


As you could see from the various fdisk outputs the w2k partition was in the
fourth entry
of the MBR (i.e. entry No 3 ... using zero based numbers) However the the
boot.ini file
on the W2K filesystem said:


[boot loader]
timeout=20
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT="Microsoft Windows 2000
Professional" /fastdetect


...I'm no W2K expert, but that partition(1)  does not sound like 4 or 3 ...I
think when W2K
says partition(1) it means 'the first non-empty partition' ... thus when
extra partitions
are added it is no longer the first non-empty entry.  THUS I suspect W2K
does have a problem
with zig-zagging chains as extra (non empty) partions appear the 'W2K name'
for itself keeps
changing.

BTW: I think you might have picked up on a question I asked about
terminology ... since the terms
people use here seem to differ a lot (slot No, entry, partition No etc, zero
based one based etc)
I suspect this is at the root of a lot of confusion.


FYI; I 'cloned' the disk [roir to install so I still have the 'before' image
as well as the 'after' image.

--

Graeme




The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal 
attention
of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential.  If you are not the intended
addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is
unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message.  Any
representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. 
 
ntl Group Limited





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]