[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
From: |
sese granola |
Subject: |
Re: Time to fork the netboot code? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2001 17:04:10 -0700 |
To create a dependency upon any OS's code is to tie GRUB to a particular os
which betrays the very name GRUB. If one of the reasons for using the bios
is to avoid this very issue and if there is no sentiment to use a standard
interface within GRUB then what is the whole point of GRUB?
bill lr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Granberry" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
> I think that any switch to another set of ethernet drivers is a change
> best left for after a release of 1.0.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-grub mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
>
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, (continued)
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Christoph Plattner, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Matthias Granberry, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?,
sese granola <=
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/09
RE: Time to fork the netboot code?, Gregg C Levine, 2001/05/08