[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179)
From: |
Deri |
Subject: |
Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179) |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:23:44 +0000 |
On Wednesday, 2 November 2022 13:08:45 GMT joerg van den hoff wrote:
> as far as I have understood the discussions in those threads, the problem
> seems to have been attributed to a naming collision (or rather the presence
> of a sqrtex glyph in the font)?
>
I believe the reason is because the glyph for the sqrtex/radicalex which groff
delivers in the Symbol font actually overlines the following glyph, and it is
the definition in ps.tmac which "corrects" this so that it works for eqn.
Other fonts which have their own sqrtex glyph actually overline themselves
(rather than what follows), so they don't need the same correction.
What happens if you include the command
.rchar radicalex
to remove this correction?
Cheers
Deri
- \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/02
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179),
Deri <=
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/02
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), Deri, 2022/11/02
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/03
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), Deri, 2022/11/03
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/03
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/03
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), Deri, 2022/11/03
- Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/04
Re: \[sqrtex] woes (related to bugs bug #62923 and #63179), joerg van den hoff, 2022/11/02