[bug #40967] [me] explain how package alters usual `sp` behavior

[Dave]

Follow-up Comment #24, bug #40967 (project groff):

[comment #22 comment #22:]
> I admit I'm indulging a bit of a mallet swing vis à vis pegs
> and holes.

I have no quarrel with that.  I just wanted to make sure we were on the same
page in understanding how we got here.  Strategically rewriting history is
fine; inadvertently rewriting it less so.

> And I would be remiss if I didn't mention that you get `sp`'s
> troff semantics back on title pages created with me(7)'s `tp`
> request.

Good to know!  I admit I miss a lot of -me detail because I use only a
fraction of its functionality, and .tp isn't one of the macros I tend to use.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40967>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/