[bug #52486] [PATCH] groff_hdtbl.7.man: remove .nh/.hy pairs related to .nf/.fi pairs

[Bjarni Ingi Gislason]

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52486>

                 Summary: [PATCH] groff_hdtbl.7.man: remove .nh/.hy pairs
related to .nf/.fi  pairs
                 Project: GNU troff
            Submitted by: bjarniig
            Submitted on: Thu 23 Nov 2017 01:08:10 PM UTC
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: Documentation
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None

    _______________________________________________________

Details:


>From f3abe39c173876ba3347e3f2a40a469588bdda14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:53:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] groff_hdtbl.7.man: remove .nh/.hy pairs related to .nf/.fi
 pairs

  The request ".hy" is the same as ".hy 1".

Signed-off-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <address@hidden>
---
 contrib/hdtbl/groff_hdtbl.7.man | 36 ------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/hdtbl/groff_hdtbl.7.man
b/contrib/hdtbl/groff_hdtbl.7.man
index 573eb6c7..fe2feb1e 100644
--- a/contrib/hdtbl/groff_hdtbl.7.man
+++ b/contrib/hdtbl/groff_hdtbl.7.man
@@ -213,11 +213,9 @@ Either add the line
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .RS
 .CR .mso hdtbl.tmac
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -229,11 +227,9 @@ package, or add the option
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .RS
 .CR \-m hdtbl
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -266,14 +262,12 @@ Here we construct a table with only one cell.
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR .TBL
 .CR .TR
 .CR .TD
 .CI contents of the table cell
 .CR .ETB
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .
@@ -284,7 +278,6 @@ representation is
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .ft CR
 .RS
 +------------------------------------------------------+
@@ -292,7 +285,6 @@ representation is
 +------------------------------------------------------+
 .RE
 .ft
-.hy
 .fi
 .
 .
@@ -301,11 +293,9 @@ Equivalent to the above is the following notation.
 .
 .PP
 .RS
-.nh
 .nf
 .CRI ".TBL .TR .TD \[dq]" "contents of the table cell" "\[dq] .ETB"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .
@@ -329,13 +319,11 @@ can be written as
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR ".TBL cols=2"
 .CR ".  TR .TD 1*1 .TD 1*2"
 .CR ".  TR .TD 2*1 .TD 2*2"
 .CR ".ETB"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .
@@ -347,7 +335,6 @@ representation is
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .ft CR
 .RS
 +--------------------------+---------------------------+
@@ -357,7 +344,6 @@ representation is
 +--------------------------+---------------------------+
 .RE
 .ft
-.hy
 .fi
 .
 .
@@ -386,7 +372,6 @@ Note, however, that this table
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR ".TBL"
 .CR ".  TR"
 .CR ".    TD"
@@ -402,7 +387,6 @@ Note, however, that this table
 .CR ".      ETB"
 .CR ".ETB"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -411,7 +395,6 @@ and this table
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR ".TBL cols=2"
 .CR ".  TR"
 .CR ".    TD colspan=2"
@@ -423,7 +406,6 @@ and this table
 .CR ".      nop 2*2"
 .CR ".ETB"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -437,7 +419,6 @@ The first table looks like
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .ft CR
 .RS
 +------------------------------------------------------+
@@ -449,7 +430,6 @@ The first table looks like
 +------------------------------------------------------+
 .RE
 .ft
-.hy
 .fi
 .
 .PP
@@ -457,7 +437,6 @@ and the second one like
 .
 .PP
 .nf
-.nh
 .ft CR
 .RS
 +------------------------------------------------------+
@@ -467,7 +446,6 @@ and the second one like
 +---------------------------+--------------------------+
 .RE
 .ft
-.hy
 .fi
 .
 .PP
@@ -476,11 +454,9 @@ Here the latter table in a more compact form.
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR ".TBL cols=2 .TR \[dq].TD colspan=2\[dq] 1*1 1*2"
 .CR ".            TR .TD 2*1 .TD 2*2 .ETB"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .
@@ -794,12 +770,10 @@ and causes incorrect results.
 .
 .RS
 .IP
-.nh
 .nf
 .CR ".TR .TD 1*1 \[dq].TD 1*2 rowspan=2\[dq] .TD 1*3"
 .CR ".TR \[dq].TD 2*1 colspan=2\[dq]         .TD 2*3"
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -810,14 +784,12 @@ is
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR .TBL cols=3
 .CR ".  TR" \[dq].TH colspan=2\[dq] header1+2 .TH header3
 .CR ".  TR" .TD 1*1 .TD 1*2 .TD 1*3
 .CR ".  TR" .TD 2*1 \[dq].TD colspan=2\[dq] 2*2+3
 .CR .ETB
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -830,7 +802,6 @@ This looks like
 .\}
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 +------------------------------+---------------+
 |          header1+2           |    header3    |
 +--------------+---------------+---------------+
@@ -840,7 +811,6 @@ This looks like
 +--------------+-------------------------------+
 .RE
 .ft
-.hy
 .fi
 .
 .PP
@@ -851,7 +821,6 @@ is
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR .TBL cols=3
 .CR ".  TR"
 .CR ".  TD" 1*1
@@ -863,7 +832,6 @@ is
 .CR ".  TD" 2*3
 .CR .ETB
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
@@ -873,13 +841,11 @@ which looks like
 .ft CR
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 +--------------+---------------+---------------+
 | 1*1          | 1+2*2         | 1*3           |
 +--------------+               +---------------+
 | 2*1          |               | 2*3           |
 +--------------+---------------+---------------+
-.hy
 .fi
 .RE
 .ft CR
@@ -1222,12 +1188,10 @@ For example:
 .PP
 .RS
 .nf
-.nh
 .CR ".am address@hidden"
 .CR ".  t*EM"
 .CR ".."
 .fi
-.hy
 .RE
 .
 .PP
-- 
2.15.0






    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52486>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/