[bug #50989] Incorrect generation of typesetting.pdf

[Bertrand Garrigues]

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #50989 (project groff):

On my system all the fonts in `/usr/share/ghostscript/9.21/Resource/Font' have
the same problem (there are not .pfb, 6-bytes header missing).  Should we try
to contact people from ghostscript to ask them why they won't install these
fonts in .pfb format anymore, or implement what Deri suggests to support Type
1 font in non-pfb format? The problem is that there are already 2 official
versions of ghostscript (9.20, 9.21) that install these fonts.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50989>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/