[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24973: [regression] [d-f] no longer includes e with acute accent in
|
From: |
Dennis Clarke |
|
Subject: |
bug#24973: [regression] [d-f] no longer includes e with acute accent in single-byte locales |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2016 16:38:29 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
On 11/20/2016 04:14 PM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
printf '\351\n' | LC_ALL=en_US.iso88591
On a Solaris 10 system the locales are named a bit different :
dasoyva_$ locale -a
C
POSIX
en_CA
en_CA.ISO8859-1
en_CA.UTF-8
en_US
en_US.ISO8859-1
en_US.ISO8859-15
address@hidden
en_US.UTF-8
es
es_MX
es_MX.ISO8859-1
es_MX.UTF-8
fr
fr_CA
fr_CA.ISO8859-1
fr_CA.UTF-8
dasoyva_$ LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/bin/printf '\351\n' | od -Ax -t x1 -v
0000000 e9 0a
0000002
I am not sure if the single byte 0xe9h is correct at all for this test.
dasoyva_$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 /usr/bin/printf '\351\n' | od -Ax -t x1 -v
0000000 e9 0a
0000002
dasoyva_$ LC_ALL=en_US.ISO8859-1 /usr/bin/printf '\351\n'
�
Wonder how I would test this on a strict POSIX system here. Any thoughts?
Dennis