[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NUL
From: |
Norihiro Tanaka |
Subject: |
bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:30:06 +0900 |
Thanks for the review.
This is a potential bug fix. However, match_mb_charset function isn't
used in grep and gawk, as DFA treats MBCSET as BACKREF by following code
if `backref' is provided. Therefore the fix never induces any semantic
change in grep and gawk.
if (d->states[s].has_mbcset && backref)
{
*backref = 1;
goto done;
}
Essentially, the function is able to be removed. However, if we regard
DFA as a library, we should keep it.
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/10/18
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Jim Meyering, 2014/10/18
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression,
Norihiro Tanaka <=
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Jim Meyering, 2014/10/18
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/10/18
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Jim Meyering, 2014/10/19
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Jim Meyering, 2014/10/19
- bug#18762: [PATCH] dfa: don't consider RE_DOT_NEWLINE and RE_DOT_NOT_NULL in matching with a bracket expression, Norihiro Tanaka, 2014/10/20