Re: any interest in Rational Range Interpretation?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/11/2011 12:24 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > >  BTW, I reviewed the patch again and the hunk changing regexec is also
> > >  wrong.
> There were no changes to regexec, only in regcomp. Similar in dfa.c.

I meant the hunk removing the regexec calls in dfa.c.  It can stay, so 
the patch you sent for match_mb_charset should be all that's needed for 
dfa.c.  I don't have a testcase because usually dfa.c punts and calls 
the glibc when it finds a multi-byte bracket.

For regex, you should likewise look for wcscoll in regexec.c and fix it. 
 Here, the testcase should be that for example [d-f] should not match "è".

Paolo