[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on MSVC 9
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on MSVC 9 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:18:04 +0100 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
>> * MSVC 9
>>
>> Compilation failure:
>
> Once this compilation failure is fixed, more compilation failures
> (due to syntax errors) occur in
> dfa.c:822
> dfa.c:3426
> kwsearch.c:43
> kwsearch.c:110
> main.c:2146
>
> It's an ISO C99 vs. ANSI C issue (declaration after statement).
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for the report, but I am very reluctant to change
grep's sources to accommodate compilers that do not support
decl-after-stmt. If enough people lobby for it, I might
maintain a c99-to-c89.diff patch.
> Also, in pcresearch.c the definition of Pexecute does not have the same
> declspecs as the declaration in search.h:54. A similar fix as for
> obstack.c should work.
Can you post a patch?
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, (continued)
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/12
- Re: grep-2.9.69-f91c on OSF/1, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/12
grep-2.9.69-f91c testing, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/11
Re: grep-2.10 testing (was: grep-2.9.69-f91c testing), Bruno Haible, 2011/11/20
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/20
- Message not available
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/20
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/20
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/21
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Bruno Haible, 2011/11/21
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/21
- Re: grep-2.10 testing, Jim Meyering, 2011/11/21