bug-grep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dfa.c fix for C89 compilers


From: Aharon Robbins
Subject: Re: dfa.c fix for C89 compilers
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:36:18 +0300

> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:02:20 +0200
> From: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> To: Aharon Robbins <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Subject: Re: dfa.c fix for C89 compilers
>
> On 04/01/2010 08:25 AM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > I have testers for SCO Unix using GCC 2.95 (!),
>
> Given the reason why SCO support was removed from GCC, we can safely say 
> that the FSF does not care about SCO Unix.
>
> Paolo

I don't care about SCO. I *do* care about the *end users* who are
using it and are stuck with it.  And that's the difference here: do
we care about end users or don't we?

Said individual says that SCO Unix will be his company's main platform
for several years yet.  He has been very helpful to me over the years,
why should I start screwing him over now?

Arnold




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]