[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:55:34 +0200 |
> Being limited by C is indeed frustrating.
C++ is widespread enough that it might not be unreasonable to move towards
it, esp. for some of the smaller GNU apps. Groff has always been in C++,
and with the availability of g++, that doesn't seem to be a big issue.
Make and GCC/G++ still need to be in C for bootstrapping. I'm no longer
convinced that the rest of GNU has to follow suit.
A separate issue is making the decision as to which apps are worth
rewriting in C++, vs. just pushing forward with what's there. E.g.,
I dunno that I want to put a lot of time into redoing gawk in C++.
Grep is a smaller program, though.
Arnold
- [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/22
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Julian Foad, 2004/11/22
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/23
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Jim Meyering, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Elliott Hughes, 2004/11/24
- Re: [bug-grep] search.c clean-up, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/24