Re: virtual table off by three problem

[André Pönitz]

Aubrey Holland <address@hidden> wrote:
> OK, I finally figured it out.  I had a class definition like this:
> 
> class A
> {
>       virtual void a();
> #ifdef NEEDED_DEFINE
>       virtual void b();
> #endif
>       virtual void c();
> };

That's a big no-no. Different definitions of the same class are ok only in
very restricted cases. IIRC the token sequences produced must by identical,
so you could shift some whitespace around, but not leave out a function
declaration.

Andre'

-- 
André Pönitz .............................................. address@hidden