[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat vs Icecat mobile behavior
From: |
Brennan |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat vs Icecat mobile behavior |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Dec 2017 09:56:00 -0600 |
The only blocker in use is the built-in spyBlock extension. I assumed this
add-on would use the same list on mobile or desktop. The only change is I’ve
added the malware domains(dot)com subscription.
> On Dec 24, 2017, at 16:50, Mart Rootamm <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi, Brennan.
>
> If and what kind of blocker extension do you use in mobile IceCat? Are
> its blocklists updated?
>
> Are there any OS-level blocker apps installed, such as Adblock Plus?
>
> -M.
>
> 2017-12-19 23:11 GMT +02:00, Brennan <address@hidden>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’ve been using Icecat on desktop for quite some time, and just recently
>> began using it on android. I noticed some ads are coming through on mobile,
>> but not on desktop. Is there a difference in the block lists being
>> implemented in the mobile vs. desktop versions of Icecat? Is there some
>> other detail I’m overlooking that would be causing this?
>>
>> I’m using Icecat mobile downloaded from F-droid, and the desktop version
>> built on MacOS Sierra (10.12.6) but following the directions for High
>> Sierra.
>>
>> Thank you for the awesome work you’re doing!
>>
>> B
>>
>> --
>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>