Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?

[Antonio Trande]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 09:28 PM, Loic J. Duros wrote:
> 
> We're working on the release of IceCat based off 27.0.1, actually.
> 
> 
> Mauricio Fernandez Vitri <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I've done some research and found that there are security updates
>> which fix more than 14 critical bugs for Firefox ESR [1].
>> 
>> Aren't those critical bugs important enough to update IceCat? 
>> Would you please consider updating it to the latest ESR?
>> 
>> Thanks for your work,
>> 
>> Mauricio
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefoxESR.html


I
>> 
glad to see that this mailing list is populated since I wrote some
mails without a reply.
When you think will Icecat 27 be ready?

- -- 
Antonio Trande

mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: D400D6C4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=q9fy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----