Re: Xulrunner branding

[Nick White]

Quoth Reed Loden:
> On Aug 3, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Nick White wrote:
>
>> Gentoo separates the xulrunner and browser components into separate
>> packages (both from the firefox source tarball). I intend to do the
>> same from the icecat tarball, but I'm wondering what I should name
>> the xulrunner component. I was thinking just "xulrunner-libre", but
>> if anyone has any other ideas or thinks a more 'icecat' themed name
>> would be appropriate, please share your thoughts.
>
> What would the differences be between normal xulrunner and xulrunner-libre?
> Seems like you could just use the same xulrunner packages and just build
> icecat on top of it.

Actually, you seem to be right. I assumed that there was more that 
icecat removed, but comparing the remove.nonfree script to the files 
from a vanilla xulrunner install, it seems that it's all free 
software there.

So I'll just keep using the vanilla xulrunner as a base.

Thanks,

Nick


-- 
GPG : 0x04E4653F           9732D7C7A441D79EFDF094F61F48567404E4653F

pgp53dNK9Lqka.pgp
Description: PGP signature