[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: license
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: license |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:36:56 -0500 |
Hi Jim,
It seems a lot faster than Firefix to me.
I'm glad, although I don't know why that should be :).
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org/download/ doesn't have a license file that I can
We are keeping the mozilla tri-licensing, because we want and hope any
code we write to be picked up by them. I'll add something explicit to
README.ICEWEASEL about it.
Do you expect that someone may do a Swiftfox on the project?
I guess if it's possible with the original mozilla, it'll be possible
with gnuzilla. I know the MPL allows it, but with the tri-licensing, do
they really get to pick and choose which license terms to follow? Did
the mozilla foundation have anything to say about it?
Or is Iceweasel going to be a "larger work"?
Sorry, apparently I'm not as familiar with all the mozilla licensing
bits as you -- can you tell me what you're referring to here?
Best,
Karl
- license, jim Bielefeldt, 2006/10/18
- Re: license,
Karl Berry <=