Re: x-to-1

[Reuben Thomas]

On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 08:48, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:

I got the impression that without a .x file, the NAME section of the output
is too silly.

This is correct, but although (as you observe) this means that some documentation goes in the Makefile.am, it avoids repeating the name of the package.

Hmm, I guess I should have a foo.x.in that uses @PACKAGE@ instead.

--

https://rrt.sc3d.org