Re: [PATCH] Basic support for checking NFSv4 ACLs in Linux

[Andreas Grünbacher]

Am Di., 15. Nov. 2022 um 03:45 Uhr schrieb Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>:
> On 11/14/22 00:16, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> > The disadvantage is that it pulls back dependency on libacl for some reason 
> > (the code does not
> > use libacl at all
>
> Yes, this needs to be fixed somehow, as part of the point of this Gnulib
> module is to not require programs like GNU ls to dynamically link to libacl.

Looks like an operator error; there's nothing in that patch that would
cause an additional dependency.

> It's also bad that GNU ls dynamically links to libpcre2, because
> libselinux requires libpcre2(!) but I digress.

Ouch.

Thanks,
Andreas