Re: [PATCH] Basic support for checking NFSv4 ACLs in Linux

[Paul Eggert]

On 11/14/22 00:16, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> The disadvantage is that it pulls back dependency on libacl for some reason 
> (the code does not
> use libacl at all

Yes, this needs to be fixed somehow, as part of the point of this Gnulib 
module is to not require programs like GNU ls to dynamically link to libacl.

It's also bad that GNU ls dynamically links to libpcre2, because 
libselinux requires libpcre2(!) but I digress.