Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics

[Pádraig Brady]

On 12/08/16 04:38, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>> On Aug 10, 2016, at 05:59, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Those look good to squash and apply,
>> modulo s/setftime/strftime/ in modules/parse-datetime
> 
> Thank you for the review.
> Attached a squashed patch.
> I kept the name of the new function as 'parse_datetime2' (if that's 
> acceptable).

There's precedent for .....2() versions of functions, like renameat2() etc.
How about we pass an unsigned int flags, instead of bool, in case we ever
need to extend in future?