Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error

From:	Andreas Grünbacher
Subject:	Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error
Date:	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:09:17 +0200

2015-04-28 13:48 GMT+02:00 Andreas Grünbacher <address@hidden>:
> Any progress with the qset_acl and qcopy_acl rewrite on non-Linux platforms?

(I've just pushed minor fixes to my github repositories for that.)

Thanks,
Andreas

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[COREUTILS 0/2] Improved acl handling, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2015/04/12
- [COREUTILS 1/2] build: updated gnulib acl handling, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2015/04/12
- [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2015/04/12
  - Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error, Pádraig Brady, 2015/04/20
    - Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error, Andreas Grünbacher, 2015/04/27
    - Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error, Andreas Grünbacher, 2015/04/28
    - Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error, Andreas Grünbacher <=
- Re: [COREUTILS 0/2] Improved acl handling, Pádraig Brady, 2015/04/12

Prev by Date: Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] file-has-acl: new module, split from acl
Previous by thread: Re: [COREUTILS 2/2] ls: Don't treat lack of acl support as an error
Next by thread: Re: [COREUTILS 0/2] Improved acl handling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread