[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: passfd on more platforms
From: |
Bastien ROUCARIES |
Subject: |
Re: passfd on more platforms |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:37:20 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 17:10, Bastien ROUCARIES
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2011 05:03 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not sure BTW it will be really simple:
>>>> - send as oob data if fail with WSAEOPNOTSUPP come back to normal send
>>>
>>> But it will _always_ fail if people are using sendfd/recvfd as we (should)
>>> document it, i.e. on SOCK_DGRAM sockets!
>>
>> Yes and if it fail we will fall back to the normal send, so no fail
>
> So why try in the first place?!?
In order to have a working solution for SOCK_STREAM
Bastien
> Paolo
>
- Re: passfd on more platforms, (continued)
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms,
Bastien ROUCARIES <=
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Eric Blake, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Bastien ROUCARIES, 2011/03/14
- Re: passfd on more platforms, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/14